Sect versus secte

Sect or secte? There is obviously a case of "lost in translation" in both the literary and cultural sense. I just don't get it...

Remember the shriners? Those funny men riding around in their little cars at your local 4th of July parade? Well, I grew up thinking they were part of a sect. You know, the Freemasons. Then one day a few years ago, just after my grandfather had his first stroke, we found my great-grandfather's freemason ring. Yes, I have some in the family. Oh no! The Freemason sect! Then, I found out that there are actually a number of francmaçons in my French circle including some in my extended belle-famille. It's all very hush-hush, you can't tell anyone and you would definitely never find a french francmaçon riding around in a silly little car on Bastille Day. In fact, the only freemason who is "out" in France is the Grand Puba who actually is consulted for important government decisions. Yeah, I know!

Then there is scientology. In LA, it's funny to walk down Hollywood Boulevard and take their tests. It's funny to drive past the grand temple and see which stars you can spot. It's funny to make fun of Tom Cruise for being such a prick about Brooke Shields' post-partum depression. But not in France. Oh no. Yesterday, the French court ruled to disband the scientology church in France (which I've heard Sarko is part of. Yes, I am spreading an unfounded rumor).

So tell me, what's the difference? What makes a sect a sect or a secte a secte? 'Cause as far as I know, both France and the US believe in freedom of religion (in theory at least) and a sect is something intrinsically evil. Then again, if Jesus, Moses, Mohammed or Buddha didn't have millions of followers each, they'd be the sects and we'd all be following the laws according to Tom Cruise, Beck and the entire cast of My Name is Earl.